

education provided through professional teams. The imple-
mentation of patient-centered care in diabetes can include
diet and exercise, treatment-taking, psychological stress,
self-monitoring of blood glucose, and sick-day management
to reduce the risk of long-term complications, such as kidney
disease, coronary artery disease, stroke, blindness and
amputation. Diabetes self-management education/support
access to a multidiscipline team, care planning discussions,
reminding, informatics and annual checks are important
procedures to identify necessary changes to treatment
regimens and refer to specialist services. Integrated diabetes
care is both integration of a health care system and co-
ordination of services around a patient. Integration of
services around the patient and across the community
becomes more robust and effective as evidenced by many
scientific reports. Our polyclinic specific on diabetes care
constitute of diabetologist, neurologist, ophthalmologist,
nephrologist, hepatologist, psychologist, and certified dia-
betes educators that serving over 5,000 patients with
diabetes. Our experience on integrated care specific on
diabetes management may suggest higher quality of man-
agement would be observed if patients are managed under
the system. However, challenges and barriers of quality
improvement in diabetes care still exist and need to be
conquered by wisdom and encouragement.
Self-Management of Diabetes Education
S40-1
The role of shared decision making in diabetes education
Mei Chang YEH
1
.
1
School of Nursing, College of Medicine, National
Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
Patient-centered care has been found to be associated with
improved patient outcomes, including improved self-manage-
ment, patient satisfaction, and medication adherence. A
patient-centered care is defined as: providing care that is
respectful of and responsive to individual patient preferences,
needs, and values and ensuring that patient values guide all
clinical decisions. Shared decision making is one of practical
and well-described methods to accomplish patient-centered
care.
Shared decision making has been defined as:
“
an approach
where clinicians and patients share the best available
evidence when faced with the task of making decisions,
and where patients are supported to consider options, to
achieve informed preferences
”
. In shared decision making
the clinicians
’
role is to help patients understand what the
reasonable options are, clarify treatment options, and
integrate patients
’
informed preferences as they relate to
the available options. Usually a patient has more than one
reasonable treatment option, informed preferences are an
optimal goal because the decisions made will be better
understood, based on more accurate expectations about the
negative and positive consequences and more consistent
with personal preferences. In other words, individual self-
determination is a desirable goal and clinicians need to
support patients to achieve this goal.
The model of how to do shared decision making is based on
choice, option and decision making. Three key domains of
shared decision making are (1) Information-Sharing, Clini-
cians help patients participate by providing high quality
information and also need to elicit what patients already
know, and whether it is correct. (2) Deliberation, Clinicians
support patients to full disclosure of treatment options, and
explore their reactions to information. (3) Decision-making/
implementation, Clinicians support patients to consider
preferences and decide what is best. Patients and clinicians
arrive at a treatment plan. Barriers and facilitators to shared
decision making in diabetes education also will be mentioned.
S40-2
A diabetes self-management education/support structured
program built for patients with poor glycemic control
Hui-Chun HSU
1
, Yu-Hung CHANG
1
, Yau-Jiunn LEE
1
,
Ruey-Hsia WANG
2
.
1
Department of Internal Medicine, Lee
’
s
Endocrinology Clinic, Pingtung,
2
Department of Nursing, School of
Nursing, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
Diabetes self-management education/support (DSME/S)
refers to the education and support that is required for
implementing and sustaining coping skills and behaviors
needed to self-manage on an ongoing basis. It is well esta-
blished that diabetes self-management education (DSME), a
complex health intervention, is generally effective at enhan-
cing self-care behaviors, improving glycemic control, lowering
health care costs, and improving quality of life. We thought
that the theoretical basis and framework of the behavior
change approach for the structured educational intervention
among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in poor glycemic
control is essential.
Focus group education approach such as Conversation Map
™
(CM), an innovative visual tool grounded in several learning
and behavior change theories, may be a promising toolkit for
DSME. In contrast to traditional DSME provided by a one-to-one
didactic method, CM is performed in a small group and allows
patients to learn about key concepts through interactive
discussion and choose what they can change in their daily
diabetes care. In the meantime, instead of as inculcators, dia-
betes educators can work as facilitators by providing informa-
tion to participants and helping patients to set personalized
action goals to improve their diabetes care. To date, the content
of CM has been recognized by several professional societies (e.
g., the American Diabetes Association (ADA), International
Diabetes Federation (IDF), Canadian Diabetes Association and
Taiwan Association of Diabetes Educators (TADE).
Despite CMhaving been distributed worldwide for the past few
years, scientific evidence is limited and its clinical value may
also be challenged. We thought it should be noted that the
delivery of DSME largely depends on the resources of the
healthcare system and the clinical scenario. Hence, we design
the program with CM in in our routine focus group education
every Tuesday afternoon and share the experience to you.
Lunch Seminar
–
LG Life Science
LN02-1
Optimizing glucose control with gemigliptin in type 2 diabetes
Jeong Hyun PARK
1
.
1
Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism,
Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Busan Paik
Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
Type 2 diabetes is a complex and progressive disease which
requires continuous medical care with multifactorial risk
reduction. Glycemic variability and chronic sustained hyper-
glycemia are themain components of dysglycemia in diabetes.
Because even short periods of hyperglycemia increase the risk
of micro- and macrovasular complications, a more proactive
approach is required to get patients to achieve their glycemic
goals sooner.
DPP-4 inhibitors are well suited for the use in a wide range of
patients with T2DM, due to their ease of use, low risk of
hypoglycemia, weight neutrality and favorable tolerability.
However, they differ widely in their binding to the DPP-4
enzyme, potency, and selectivity as well as their pharmaco-
kinetics profiles because the class is heterogeneous regarding
chemical structure.
Speech Abstracts / Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 120S1 (2016) S1
–
S39
S35