

PD-83
Efficacy of canagliflozin (CANA) in combination with
metformin (MET) in patients with T2DM: Results from
3 studies
Rong QIU
1
, John XIE
1
, Gill HAMILTON
2
,
William CANOVATCHEL
1
, Mayuresh FEGADE
3
*.
1
Janssen
Research & Development, LLC, Raritan, NJ, United States of America;
2
Janssen-Cilag Ltd, High Wycombe, United Kingdom;
3
Janssen
Medical Affairs, Mumbai, India
Objective:
In the AACE clinical practice guidelines, SGLT2
inhibitors, such as CANA, are the first oral medication
recommended for patients inadequately controlled on MET.
This analysis assessed the efficacy of CANA in patients with
T2DM in combination with MET in 3 studies.
Methods:
Changes in A1C, body weight (BW), and systolic
blood pressure (SBP) were assessed in 3 randomized, double-
blind, Phase 3 studies of CANA in combination with MET.
CANA 100 and 300 mg were assessed vs placebo (PBO) at Week
26 and sitagliptin 100 mg (SITA) at Week 52 in Study 1
(N = 1,284), and vs glimepiride (GLIM) at Weeks 52 and 104 in
Study 2 (N = 1,450). In Study 3, drug-naïve T2DM patients (N =
1,186) received initial combination therapy with MET + CANA
100 mg (CANA100/MET) or MET + CANA 300 mg (CANA300/
MET) vs MET alone for 26 weeks.
Results:
In Study 1, CANA 100 and 300 mg significantly lowered
A1C vs PBO at Week 26; CANA 100 mg demonstrated non-
inferiority and CANA 300 mg demonstrated superiority vs SITA
at Week 52 (
–
0.73%,
–
0.88%,
–
0.73%). In Study 2, CANA 100 mg
demonstrated noninferiority and CANA 300 mg demonstrated
superiority in A1C lowering vs GLIM at Week 52; reductions
were
–
0.65%,
–
0.74%, and
–
0.55% at Week 104. In Study 3,
CANA100/MET and CANA300/MET significantly lowered
A1C vs MET at Week 26 (
–
1.77%,
–
1.78%,
–
1.30%; P = 0.001).
Significant BWreductions were seen in Study 1 with CANA 100
and 300 mg vs PBO at Week 26 and vs SITA at Week 52 (
–
3.8%,
–
4.2%,
–
1.3%; P < 0.001). In Study 2, CANA 100 and 300 mg
significantly lowered BW vs GLIM at Week 52 (
−
4.2%,
−
4.7%,
1.0%; P < 0.001); BW changes were sustained at Week 104. In
Study 3, significantly greater weight loss was seen with
CANA100/MET and CANA300/MET vs MET at Week 26 (
–
3.5%,
–
4.2%,
–
2.1%; P = 0.001). CANA 100 and 300 mg were associated
with reductions in SBP vs PBO at Week 26 and SITA at Week 52
in Study 1, and vs GLIM at Week 52 and Week 104 in Study 2. In
Study 3, SBP reductions were
–
2.2,
–
1.7, and
–
0.3 mmHg with
CANA100/MET, CANA300/MET, andMET at Week 26. CANAwas
generally well tolerated in each study, with increased inci-
dence of adverse events related to SGLT2 inhibition (e.g.,
genital mycotic infections) and low rates of hypoglycemia.
Conclusion:
In 3 studies, CANA in combination with MET
improved A1C, BW, and SBP, suggesting that a fixed-dose
combination of CANA + MET may be beneficial in patients
with T2DM.
PD-84
Real-world 12-month outcomes of patients with type 2
diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treated with canagliflozin in a US
managed care setting
Wing CHOW
1
, Erin BUYSMAN
2
, Marcia RUPNOW
1
,
Amy ANDERSON
2
, Henry HENK
2
, Mayuresh FEGADE
3
*.
1
Janssen
Scientific Affairs, LLC, Raritan, NJ,
2
Optum, Eden Prairie, MN, United
States of America;
3
Janssen Medical Affairs, Mumbai, India
Canagliflozin (CANA), the first approved agent that inhibits
sodium glucose co-transporter 2, improves glycemic control
through an insulin-independent mechanism. This study
evaluates glycemic control pre- and post-CANA over a 12
month period. This retrospective cohort study used data froma
large US health plan for adult commercial and Medicare
Advantage enrollees with T2DM filling CANA between April
2013 andAugust 2014who hadA1C results pre andpost the first
observed CANA prescription and a pre-CANA A1C
≥
7.0%. Of
identified patients (n = 2,269), 61% had CANA 100 mg on the
first observed fill, 41%were female, andmean agewas 56 years.
Pre-CANA mean A1C was 8.93% ± 1.56%. Patients, on average,
used 2.4 ± 1.1 unique antihyperglycemic agents (AHAs) in the
pre-CANAperiod, inclusive of injectables. Basedon the last A1C
result
≥
30 days following the first observed CANA claim in the
12-month post-CANA period, patients had amean reduction of
0.96% ± 1.56%, with an average time to post-CANA A1C of 262
days. At baseline about 31% patients had mean A1C between
7%and 8%. The proportion of patients achieving A1C <7.0%and
<8.0% were approximately 25% and 59% post-CANA. The
proportion of patients with mean A1C more than 8% reduced
to 41% in post-CANA period from 69% at baseline. CANA was
prescribed to patients with T2DMwhowere often uncontrolled
(mean pre-CANA A1C of 8.93%) despite prior treatment with
multiple AHAs. Improvements in A1C consistent to those
found in clinical trials were observed in the 12 months
following the first CANA prescription.
PD-85
Efficacy of canagliflozin (CANA) versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4
inhibitors (DPP-4i) in patients with T2DM: Results from RCTs
and Real-World (RW) study
William CANOVATCHEL
1
, Sarah THAYER
2
, Wing CHOW
3
,
Rong QIU
1
, Michael DAVIES
3
, Mayuresh FEGADE
4
*.
1
Janssen
Research & Development, LLC, Raritan, NJ,
2
Optum, Eden Prairie,
MN,
3
Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Raritan, NJ, United States of
America;
4
Janssen Medical Affairs, Mumbai, India
In RCTs, CANAwas shown to be more effective than the DPP-4i
sitagliptin (SITA) in lowering glucose. RCT and RW results tend
to differ as RW studies may include a broader set of patients
with more advanced conditions; thus it is important to assess
the effects of agents in clinical practice. We compared the A1C-
lowering efficacy of CANA 100 and 300 mg versus SITA 100 mg
in 3 RCTs of patients with T2DM, and the effectiveness of
CANA (pooled data for all doses) in a retrospective RW
matched control-cohort study using US integrated claims
and laboratory data froma large population of insured patients
with T2DM (65% and 34% of patients received CANA 100 or
300 mg, respectively [1% other]). Three RCTs included in the
analysis were 12 week follow up study as add-on to metformin
(n = 184), 52 week follow up study as add-on to metformin
(n = 1079) and 52 week follow up study as add-on tometformin
+ suphonylurea (n = 739). Patients in the CANA cohort were
matched 1:1 to patients in the DPP-4i cohort using propensity
score matching that incorporated demographics and baseline
characteristics. In the RW study mean (median) duration of
follow up was 182.3 (191.0) days for DPP-4i and 184.2 (197.0)
days for CANA respectively. In RCTs with baseline A1C
∼
8.0%,
CANA 100 mg provided similar and CANA 300 mg provided
greater A1C reductions versus SITA 100 mg. In the RW study
with baseline A1C
∼
9.0%, greater A1C reductions were seen
with CANA (
−
1.07%) versus DPP-4i (
−
0.79%). In summary, the
relative magnitude of A1C reduction with CANA and SITAwas
similar in the RCT and RW studies; CANA consistently lowered
A1C versus DPP-4i in patients with T2DM.
PD-87
Real-world evaluation of weight loss in patients with T2DM
treated with canagliflozin (CANA)
–
An electronic health-
record (EHR)-based study
Patrick LEFEBVRE
1
, Wing CHOW
2
, Dominic PILON
1
,
Bruno EMOND
1
, Marie-Hélène LAFEUILLE
1
, Michael PFEIFER
2
,
Marcia RUPNOW
2
, Mei Sheng DUH
3
, Mayuresh FEGADE
4
*.
1
Groupe d
’
Analyse, Ltée, Montréal, Québec, Canada;
2
Janssen
Scientific Affairs, LLC, Raritan, New Jersey,
3
Analysis Group, Inc.,
Boston, MA, United States of America;
4
Janssen Medical Affairs,
Mumbai, India
Objectives:
Weight management remains a challenging goal
for most patients with T2DM. However, CANA has been shown
Poster Presentations / Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 120S1 (2016) S65
–
S211
S118